Keyword summary
88% 13 analyzed articles/videos 7,656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Democrats results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 5,760 hits . Analysis detected 44,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,047 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 41% (34,402 of 57,880 keywords). This House Democrats is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. House Democrats
Keyword details
Total words: 43,047
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score13 analyzed articles43K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst