Author summary
82% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Lichtenberg results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 2,959 hits . Analysis detected 35,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,268 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (6,026 of 9,471 authors). This Nick Lichtenberg is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Nick Lichtenberg
Author details
Total words: 38,268
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles38.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst