Keyword summary
41% 45 analyzed articles/videos 36,752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Abbott results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 10,047 hits . Analysis detected 80,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 156,380 analyzed words across 45 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 4% (56,838 of 59,109 keywords). This Greg Abbott is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group. Greg Abbott
Keyword details
Total words: 156,380
Article count: 45
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.8% percentile 1.0% BS Score45 analyzed articles156.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst