Author summary
32% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,922 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Goldenstein results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 683 hits . Analysis detected 5,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,138 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (7,939 of 9,471 authors). This Taylor Goldenstein is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Taylor Goldenstein
Author details
Total words: 11,138
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.2% percentile 1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst