Keyword summary
61% 17 analyzed articles/videos 8,562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Endorsement results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 3,096 hits . Analysis detected 31,840 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,310 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (43,438 of 53,884 keywords). This Endorsement is better (less manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Endorsement
Keyword details
Total words: 41,310
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score17 analyzed articles41.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst