Keyword summary
75% 19 analyzed articles/videos 10,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doug Burgum results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 6,077 hits . Analysis detected 50,918 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,987 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (44,881 of 58,098 keywords). This Doug Burgum is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group. Doug Burgum
Keyword details
Total words: 60,987
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score19 analyzed articles61K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst