Keyword summary
72% 23 analyzed articles/videos 14,456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defamation results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 9,867 hits . Analysis detected 64,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 70,044 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (42,848 of 59,653 keywords). This Defamation is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Defamation
Keyword details
Total words: 70,044
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score23 analyzed articles70K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst