Author summary
4%1 analyzed article/video169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria A. Ifatusin results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Unattributed Quote, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 151 faulty-reasoning hits from 676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,336 of 8,541 authors). This Victoria A. Ifatusin is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Victoria A. Ifatusin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
85%Victoria A. Ifatusin (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 676
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.4% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles676 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 7.7%7.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 6.2%6.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Status Quo Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos