Keyword summary
46% 1 analyzed article/video 728 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck-Edwards results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 310 hits . Analysis detected 1,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 38% (32,979 of 53,020 keywords). This Chuck-Edwards is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Chuck-Edwards
Keyword details
Total words: 2,912
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst