Author summary
43% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaia Hubbard results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 271 hits . Analysis detected 2,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,180 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (4,620 of 8,610 authors). This Kaia Hubbard is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. Kaia Hubbard
Author details
Total words: 4,180
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst