Keyword summary
89% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,899 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Van Hollen results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 2,027 hits . Analysis detected 17,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,294 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 59% (22,935 of 55,967 keywords). This Chris Van Hollen is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group. Chris Van Hollen
Keyword details
Total words: 13,294
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst