Author summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video1,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Munson results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 759 hits. Analysis detected 5,317 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (1,892 of 9,194 authors). This Sam Munson is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Sam Munson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠80%Sam Munson (selected)4%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,900
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.5%13.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 15.5%15.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos