Keyword summary
73% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bruce Springsteen results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 3,560 hits . Analysis detected 29,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,732 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (38,728 of 59,525 keywords). This Bruce Springsteen is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. Bruce Springsteen
Keyword details
Total words: 30,732
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score10 analyzed articles30.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst