Author summary
96% 32 analyzed articles/videos 17,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Mosack results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 9,139 hits . Analysis detected 81,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,439 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,374 of 8,557 authors). This Katherine Mosack is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Katherine Mosack
Author details
Total words: 57,439
Article count: 32
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score32 analyzed articles57.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.9% 15.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.7% 14.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst