Keyword summary
81% 12 analyzed articles/videos 13,303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Gates results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 3,477 hits . Analysis detected 34,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,921 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (50,066 of 53,938 keywords). This Bill Gates is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group. Bill Gates
Keyword details
Total words: 55,921
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.2% percentile 1.2% BS Score12 analyzed articles55.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst