Keyword summary
68% 17 analyzed articles/videos 13,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Welfare results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 6,447 hits . Analysis detected 52,591 faulty-reasoning hits from 61,786 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 25% (45,200 of 59,653 keywords). This Animal Welfare is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Animal Welfare
Keyword details
Total words: 61,786
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score17 analyzed articles61.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst