Publication summary
11% 24 analyzed articles/videos 9,461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Enquirer results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 1,600 hits . Analysis detected 14,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,540 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 13% (480 of 551 publications). This The Enquirer is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 39,540
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.9% percentile 0.9% BS Score24 analyzed articles39.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst