Author summary
8% 1 analyzed article/video 1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brady Williams results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 144 hits . Analysis detected 1,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (7,682 of 8,721 authors). This Brady Williams is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. Brady Williams
Author details
Total words: 4,604
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Middle Ground: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst