Author summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fox19 staff results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (2,091 of 8,669 authors). This Fox19 staff is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Fox19 staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠76%Fox19 staff (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 972
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510075.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles972 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.8%3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos