Topic summary
⁠69%3 analyzed articles/videos2,246 analyzed words
BS Summary: These X Men results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 2,278 hits. Analysis detected 9,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,984 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (9,657 of 24,545 topics). This X Men is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
X Men
Topic details
Total words: 8,984
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.4%25.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos