Topic summary
⁠71%4 analyzed articles/videos4,127 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Strategy results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 2,499 hits. Analysis detected 16,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,508 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (14,119 of 24,545 topics). This War Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
War Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 16,508
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.1%15.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos