Author summary
69%8 analyzed articles/videos3,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Bowers Bahney results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,283 hits. Analysis detected 12,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,328 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 44% (5,332 of 9,453 authors). This Jennifer Bowers Bahney is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Jennifer Bowers Bahney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
44%Jennifer Bowers Bahney (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,328
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate