Topic summary
29%2 analyzed articles/videos1,229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Volleyball results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 421 hits. Analysis detected 2,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,916 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 36% (14,426 of 22,304 topics). This Volleyball is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Volleyball
Topic details
Total words: 4,916
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate