Topic summary
81% 16 analyzed articles/videos 16,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Blanche results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 9,661 hits . Analysis detected 67,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 66,551 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 36% (15,908 of 24,545 topics). This Todd Blanche is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Todd Blanche
Topic details
Total words: 66,551
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score16 analyzed articles66.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst