Topic summary
84% 13 analyzed articles/videos 13,344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Blanche results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 8,336 hits . Analysis detected 58,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,950 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,992 of 22,465 topics). This Todd Blanche is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group. Todd Blanche
Topic details
Total words: 53,950
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score13 analyzed articles54K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst