Author summary
95% 3 analyzed articles/videos 340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Amato results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 595 hits . Analysis detected 3,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,934 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (987 of 8,790 authors). This John Amato is worse (more manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. John Amato
Author details
Total words: 1,934
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.8% percentile 5.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 30.8% 30.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 20.7% 20.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 18.2% 18.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 19.2% 19.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Author 20.7%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Author 19.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 19.2%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 18.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.0% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst