Topic summary
90%9 analyzed articles/videos3,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Stocks results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 1,579 hits. Analysis detected 17,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,196 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 63% (8,886 of 23,745 topics). This Technology Stocks is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Technology Stocks

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate