Topic summary
86% 16 analyzed articles/videos 9,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sustainability results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 4,378 hits . Analysis detected 41,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,881 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (19,426 of 23,812 topics). This Sustainability is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. Sustainability
Topic details
Total words: 53,881
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score16 analyzed articles53.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst