Author summary
27%6 analyzed articles/videos2,384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Egitto results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 4,079 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,536 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (6,937 of 8,538 authors). This Dan Egitto is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Dan Egitto
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
19%Dan Egitto (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,536
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

19% percentile
025507510018.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate