Topic summary
61% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Subpoenas results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 2,229 hits . Analysis detected 15,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,975 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (16,298 of 24,545 topics). This Subpoenas is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Subpoenas
Topic details
Total words: 17,975
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles18K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst