Author summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah K. Burris results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 460 hits . Analysis detected 1,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,751 of 9,471 authors). This Sarah K. Burris is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. Sarah K. Burris
Author details
Total words: 2,196
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.5% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.9% 20.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst