Author summary
81% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,049 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jocelyn Noveck results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,509 hits . Analysis detected 14,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,195 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 55% (4,272 of 9,297 authors). This Jocelyn Noveck is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group. Jocelyn Noveck
Author details
Total words: 14,195
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.0% 10.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst