Topic summary
83% 6 analyzed articles/videos 892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stat results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 772 hits . Analysis detected 3,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,348 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (5,465 of 24,545 topics). This Stat is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group. Stat
Topic details
Total words: 3,348
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.7% percentile 4.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 23.1% 23.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst