Topic summary
⁠76%2 analyzed articles/videos1,163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Operations results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 576 hits. Analysis detected 3,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,277 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (9,890 of 24,586 topics). This Special Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Special Operations
Topic details
Total words: 4,277
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos