Topic summary
83% 75 analyzed articles/videos 78,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Justice results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 28,204 hits . Analysis detected 310,889 faulty-reasoning hits from 365,840 analyzed words across 75 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (17,408 of 22,261 topics). This Social Justice is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group. Social Justice
Topic details
Total words: 365,840
Article count: 75
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score75 analyzed articles365.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst