Author summary
23% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Binswanger results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 1,438 hits . Analysis detected 11,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,380 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,593 of 9,189 authors). This Julia Binswanger is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group. Julia Binswanger
Author details
Total words: 26,380
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.5% percentile 1.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles26.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst