Author summary
7% 1 analyzed article/video 1,923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Aziz results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Indoctrination , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 303 hits . Analysis detected 1,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,186 of 8,787 authors). This Sarah Aziz is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Sarah Aziz
Author details
Total words: 7,692
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.8% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst