Topic summary
68% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Savings results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,411 hits . Analysis detected 11,228 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,946 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 38% (14,249 of 22,704 topics). This Savings is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Savings
Topic details
Total words: 13,946
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst