Topic summary
58% 40 analyzed articles/videos 34,453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russia results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 12,283 hits . Analysis detected 104,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 150,627 analyzed words across 39 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (19,750 of 22,261 topics). This Russia is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Russia
Topic details
Total words: 150,627
Article count: 39
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score39 analyzed articles150.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst