Author summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 844 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Kiley results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 819 hits . Analysis detected 4,757 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,386 of 8,738 authors). This Sam Kiley is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Sam Kiley
Author details
Total words: 3,376
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.1% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.3% 24.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.4% 17.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst