Author summary
68%11 analyzed articles/videos17,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom O'Connor results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 4,616 hits. Analysis detected 52,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,252 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 22% (6,672 of 8,529 authors). This Tom O'Connor is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Tom O'Connor
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
22%Tom O'Connor (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 69,252
Article count: 11
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

22% percentile
025507510021.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score11 analyzed articles69.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate