Topic summary
88% 7 analyzed articles/videos 9,333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Road Trips results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 4,204 hits . Analysis detected 35,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,016 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (16,099 of 24,547 topics). This Road Trips is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Road Trips
Topic details
Total words: 43,016
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles43K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst