Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Richards results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 296 hits . Analysis detected 3,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (3,955 of 9,471 authors). This Anna Richards is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Anna Richards
Author details
Total words: 4,604
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst