Author summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 1,904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Saria results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 1,528 hits . Analysis detected 6,525 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,706 of 8,956 authors). This Lauren Saria is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Lauren Saria
Author details
Total words: 7,616
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 20.1% 20.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.7% 10.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 20.1%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 13.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst