Topic summary
89% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Riots results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 3,896 hits . Analysis detected 29,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,513 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 61% (9,758 of 24,547 topics). This Riots is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Riots
Topic details
Total words: 21,513
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst