Author summary
â 98% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Tucker results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 5,438 hits . Analysis detected 46,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,637 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of â 82% (1,772 of 9,471 authors). This Steven Tucker is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Steven Tucker
Author details
Total words: 22,637
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles22.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Author 23.5% 23.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.0% 24.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 23.7% 23.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.2% 14.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.6% 6.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 23.7%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 23.5%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst