Author summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Harris results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 7,793 hits . Analysis detected 48,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,953 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (3,023 of 9,290 authors). This Mark Harris is worse (more manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. Mark Harris
Author details
Total words: 30,953
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles31K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.2% 25.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.9% 14.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst