Topic summary
92% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rfk Jr. results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,100 hits . Analysis detected 10,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,821 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (10,022 of 24,545 topics). This Rfk Jr. is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Rfk Jr.
Topic details
Total words: 8,821
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst