Topic summary
63% 5 analyzed articles/videos 8,575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Recovery results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 1,909 hits . Analysis detected 18,054 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,951 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (21,233 of 22,981 topics). This Recovery is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Recovery
Topic details
Total words: 32,951
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 1.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles33K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst