Topic summary
84%18 analyzed articles/videos21,481 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Power results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 16,690 hits. Analysis detected 119,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 102,904 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,860 of 22,261 topics). This Presidential Power is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score18 analyzed articles102.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.2%16.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Transcript: Trump Rages as GOP Sen. Nukes IRS Fund in Epic Humiliation19%
The New Republic77%By The Daily Blast68% Greg Sargent70%8/3/2026, 3:21:18 AM
Trump Has Revolutionized Executive Power52%
Persuasion48%By Francis Fukuyama69%7/31/2026, 7:10:05 AM
The Next Victim of Trump’s Political Prosecutions? Congressional Oversight.76%
Mother Jones68%By Pema Levy89%7/30/2026, 11:42:49 AM
Trump, once again, threatens TV stations. Will FCC chief follow through?82%
Chicago Sun-Times50%By Jacob Sullum44%7/23/2026, 4:00:00 AM
Trump guts election commission in move seen as increasing his sway over midterms33%
The Highland County Press53%By David Lightman48% Stateline40%7/20/2026, 5:00:00 PM
Trump’s Primetime Speech Was a Dud. He Could Still Use it to Interfere in the Midterms.64%
Mother Jones68%By Ari Berman91%7/17/2026, 7:26:23 AM
The Lost Art of Coercion46%
Foreign Affairs63%By Reid Pauly0% Matthew Cebul0%7/15/2026, 9:00:00 PM
John Roberts has a much more powerful master than Trump: expert92%
Raw Story96%By Alexandria Jacobson0% Investigative Reporter81%7/7/2026, 4:45:13 AM
Trump’s Election Subversion Plans?75%
Washington Monthly71%By Garrett Epps53%7/6/2026, 2:00:00 AM
Celebrate America’s Birthday by Fighting a Wannabe King90%
The Nation87%By Sasha Abramsky97%7/3/2026, 2:00:00 AM