Topic summary
91% 9 analyzed articles/videos 9,367 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Police Reform results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 3,834 hits . Analysis detected 30,570 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,564 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (18,565 of 23,934 topics). This Police Reform is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group. Police Reform
Topic details
Total words: 36,564
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles36.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst